Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 2016No. 15-761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*816 Defendant Diego Leander Young appeals from judgments entered upon the jury verdicts finding him guilty of armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Because the State presented sufficient evidence of the existence of a conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and because defendant has failed to demonstrate any error, much less plain error, in the authentication and relevancy of photographs identified by the witnesses as depicting the person who robbed them, we find no error.

Facts

The State's evidence tended to show the following. On 15 March 2011, Patrick Keen got off work…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AbbittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  2. State v. AbbittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. harrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API