State v. Spivey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
*740In this case we decide whether an indictment charging defendant with injury to real property “of Katy’s Great Eats” is fatally flawed because it does not specifically identify “Katy’s Great Eats” as a corporation or an entity capable of owning property. An indictment for injury to real property'must describe the property in sufficient detail to identify the parcel of real property the defendant allegedly injured. The indictment needs to identify the real property itself, not the owner or ownership interest. By describing the injured real property as “the restaurant, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. RankinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. MostafaviCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. BrawleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. MostafaviSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.