Legal Opinion

Ponsrok v. City of Yonkers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The case comes up on a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint alleges that the defendant negligently constructed a city sewer so that the same became obstructed, causing its contents to back up and flood the lower floor of plaintiff’s premises to plaintiff’s damage $2,000, and that notice of claim and notice of intention to commence an action thereon were given in accordance with the provisions of section 244 of the Second Class Cities Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 53).

It is stipulated that the notice of claim shall be considered part of the complaint. The notice is in proper form except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People Ex Rel. Kenyon v. . SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Rogers v. . Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Cotriss v. Village of MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Cotriss v. . Village of MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People Ex Rel. New York City Omnibus Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Visser v. MagnarelliDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  4. Lurie v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Frame v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API