Legal Opinion
City of Louisville v. Verst
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 18, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Rees
Affirming.
The appellee, Josephine Verst, brought an action .-against the City of Louisville to recover general dam.ages in the sum of $5,000 and special damages in the .sum of $3,000 resulting from an accident in which she fell on a sidewalk and received serious injuries. She .alleged that the sidewalk was defective. The jury returned a verdict for $8,000 in favor of the plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon the City appeals. It seeks a reversal for these reasons: (1) The lower -court erred in overruling appellant’s special and general •demurrers;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Northrup v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Louisville v. HaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Treitz v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- City of Louisville v. LenehanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hagberg v. City of Sioux FallsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1968
- Williams v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Jones v. Winn-Dixie of Louisville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- City of Louisville v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.