Legal Opinion
Fioret Sales Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 5, 1938No. 121PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners are engaged in the importation and sale in this country of perfumes in competition with others engaged in interstate commerce. They were charged before the Commission with unfair trade practices in connection with their manufacture and sales, and were directed to cease and desist such practices. The Fioret Company imports from France its perfumes in the form of concentrates or compounds which are blended mixtures of various oil extracts from plants and are usually combined with some animal essence, such as musk. When these concentrates arrive in this country,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Royal Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States Retail Credit Association, Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Benton Announcements, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Allied Paper Mills v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.