Legal Opinion

Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 7, 1924No. 197PublishedCited by 242 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill in equity brought by the respondent, Coty, a citizen of France, against Prestonettes, a New York corporation, having its principal place of business in the Southern District of New York. It seeks to restrain alleged unlawful uses of the plaintiff’s registered trade marks, “ Coty ” and “ L’Origan ” upon toilet powders and perfumes. The defendant purchases the genuine powder, subjects it to pressure, adds a binder to give it coherence and sells the compact in a metal case. It buys the genuine perfume in bottles and sells it in smaller bottles. We need not mention what labels it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

3Cited by242 opinions

  1. Boston Athletic Association v. Mark Sullivan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Beltronics USA, Inc. v. Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API