Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is a bill in equity brought by the respondent, Coty, a citizen of France, against Prestonettes, a New York corporation, having its principal place of business in the Southern District of New York. It seeks to restrain alleged unlawful uses of the plaintiff’s registered trade marks, “ Coty ” and “ L’Origan ” upon toilet powders and perfumes. The defendant purchases the genuine powder, subjects it to pressure, adds a binder to give it coherence and sells the compact in a metal case. It buys the genuine perfume in bottles and sells it in smaller bottles. We need not mention what labels it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
3Cited by242 opinions
- Boston Athletic Association v. Mark Sullivan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Beltronics USA, Inc. v. Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.