Legal Opinion
Coty, Inc. v. Parfums De Grande Luxe, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 7, 1924No. 164PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought to restrain the defendants from infringing a trade-mark. The court below has granted a preliminary injunction, upon the filing of a bond in the sum of $5,000, conditioned upon the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred by any party who may be found to have been wrongfully restrained. The injunction restrains the defendants from using the name “Ernest Coty” in selling perfumes and toilet preparations, save in connection with the phrase “Not connected with the original Coty.”
The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Gerlach-Barklow Co. v. Morris & Bendien, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Queen Mfg. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc. v. Winchester Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- John B. Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.