Legal Opinion

Port of Nehalem v. Nicholson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover the amount alleged to be due upon two promissory notes, aggregating $4,407.34, executed December 20,1921, by Frank A. Rowe and indorsed by the defendant. The defendant seeks to avoid payment on the ground of duress. At the conclusion of the testimony each party moved for a directed verdict. The right to a jury trial having thus been waived, the court found in favor of defendant and entered judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

When each party moved for a directed verdict, they, in effect, stipulated that all questions of fact be submitted to the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rau v. Von ZedlitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Guinn v. Sumpter Valley Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Godell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Conger v. Eugene Plywood Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Maser v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bair v. Spokane Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API