Legal Opinion

Rau v. Von Zedlitz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.

This is a hill in equity, under the Gen. Sts. c. 113, § 2, el. 11, brought against the Baron and Baroness Von Zedlitz and the trustee under her marriage settlement. The plaintiff alleges therein that the Baroness is indebted to him upon two drafts, accepted by her at Dresden, in Saxony, on the day previous to her marriage, which are now due and unpaid, and he seeks to obtain a decree, that the trustee of the marriage settlement shall apply to the payment of the drafts so much of the trust fund as is necessary.

The defence .is, that the acceptance of the drafts was forced upon the Baroness by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eadie v. . SlimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Montgomery v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Richards v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Baldwin v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. H. G. Kilbourne Co. v. Standard Stamp Affixer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Fairbanks v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API