Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Holder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The credible evidence establishes that claimant, an unarmed security guard, was discharged from his employment after he reported to work under the influence of alcohol. “It is well settled that absent a showing that an employee is suffering from alcoholism, reporting to work under the influence of alcohol may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Kiteta [Commissioner of Labor], 4 AD3d 712, 713 [2004] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Stuber [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 1063, 1063-1064 [2006]; Matter of Kryszak [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 645, 646 [2003]). No such showing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KryszakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of KitetaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of StuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API