Mid Valley Bank v. North Valley Bank
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
This matter is before the court on various motions. For the reasons I explain below, (1) all motions for summary judgment are denied; 1 (2) defendant North Valley Bank’s (“NVB”) motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand is granted; (3) plaintiff’s motion to withdraw admissions is granted and sanctions are imposed; (4) defendant NVB’s motion for sanctions is denied, and defendants Shell Oil Company’s (“Shell”) and Della Mae Montgomery’s (“Montgomery”) motions for sanctions are granted.
I
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 56
Summary judgment is…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard PrusiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Sullivan v. William A. Randolph, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.