Legal Opinion

San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1918No. Civ. No. 1838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This appeal is taken from an order made after judgment denying the appellant’s motion for contribution under section 709 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The original action was brought upon a promissory note executed by defendant corporation to plaintiff and which, as was found by the court at the trial, was signed by defendant corporation as principal and by defendants Smith, Lynch, and Giottonini as sureties. Plaintiff had judgment in the •action and on appeal to the supreme court the judgment was affirmed on May 27, 1915. (170 Cal. 250, [149 Pac. 557].)

It was also found by the trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Guardianship of Van LoanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. California Mortgage & Savings Bank v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Merrell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Blake v. ArpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. McIntosh v. FungeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API