San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This was an action to recover six thousand dollars upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the defendants to the plaintiff. The defendants answered denying the execution of the note. The court made findings' and gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff against all the defendants. The Gate City Oil Company and J. F. Lynch appealed from the judgment within sixty days after its entry. They claim, in support of their appeal, that they did not execute the note set out in the complaint and that there is a variance between the allegations and the proof concerning the note. The merits…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Mortensen v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ankeny v. Meyer (In Re Ankeny)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.