Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County denying a motion for contribution and execution. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
On a former appeal in this case a judgment against both defendants was sustained. (Dow v. Sunset TelePhone and Telegraph Co., a corporation, and Oakland Gas, Light and Heat Co., a corporation, 157 Cal. 182, [106 Pac. 587].) Plaintiff thereafter collected the entire judgment from the Oakland Gas, Light and Heat Company. That corporation, pursuant to the provisions of section 709 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed with the county clerk of Alameda County a notice of payment of the judgment, with instructions that he make an entry of its claim for one half of the amount of said judgment and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by28 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.