Legal Opinion
California Mortgage & Savings Bank v. Graves
California Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1900No. L.A. No. 664PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Appeal by defendants from an order granting a writ of assistance.
1. It is claimed that the court erred in shortening the time for hearing the application for the writ from five to three days.
The power to shorten the time is given by section 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order of the court reads i “Good cause appearing to me therefor, it is ordered,” etc. There is nothing in the record to dispute this recital, and we must presume that the necessity for the order was made to appear, and that the power was rightly exercised.
2. Appellant claims that the judgment-roll in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murray v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Montgomery v. MiddlemissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Jenner v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- San Joaquin Valley Bank v. Gate City Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Ebner v. SteffansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.