Legal Opinion

Turner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 3, 1952No. C. D. 1425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawbence, Judge:

At the trial, the above two protests were consolidated for hearing and decision.

Importations of so-called Burnoil heaters accompanied by Burnoil draft controls were classified by the collector of customs as “machines, finished or unfinished, not specially provided for” pursuant to the provision in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 372) and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 27 K per centum ad valorem.

In the protests as originally filed, plaintiff contends that the items of merchandise above referred to are properly dutiable “at 25% ad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson Heating, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Gloy's Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API