Legal Opinion

Bentley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2002No. 49A02-0202-CR-160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

Robert Bentley brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his Motion to Suppress. He raises the following issues on appeal:

1. Whether the officer seized Bentley for investigatory purposes.

2. Whether the officer had reasonable suspicion to justify the stop under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL _. HISTORY |.

On October 10, 2001, Indianapolis Police Officers Charles Martin and Steve Walters were patrolling in the 8000 block area of North Capitol Avenue in Marion County. Officer Martin, a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Bridgewater v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. StickleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Wessling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Washburn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API