Legal Opinion
Washburn v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2007No. 29A02-0609-CR-805PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellanh-Defendant, James A. Wash-burn (Washburn), appeals the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Suppress evidence.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Washburn raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred when it denied Wash-burn’s Motion to Suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant which was based on information obtained from a warrantless trash pull.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In September of 2005, Detective Robert Locke of the City of Carmel Police Department (Detective Locke) received a telephone…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Justin Danh v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Shannon C. Blankenship v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. David v. MaloneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State v. RenzulliIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.