Michigan v. Chesternut
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In this case we review a determination by the Michigan Court of Appeals that any “investigatory pursuit” of a person undertaken by the police necessarily constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. We conclude that the police conduct in this case did not amount to a seizure, for it would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he was not at liberty to ignore the police presence and go about his business.
I
Early on the afternoon of December 19, 1984, four officers riding in a marked police cruiser were engaged in routine patrol duties in Metropolitan Detroit.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,357 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
1,352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.