State v. Stickle
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
The State charged Jeremy Stickle (“Stickle”) with theft, as a Class D felony,1 possession of marijuana, as a Class D felony,2 and possession of marijuana, as a *53Class A misdemeanor.3 Stickle moved to suppress the evidence supporting the charges on the ground the evidence was obtained pursuant to an investigatory stop conducted without reasonable suspicion. The trial court granted Stickle’s motion.
The State argues on appeal that Stickle was not seized and that even if he was, an anonymous tip the police received was sufficient to support the investigatory stop of Stickle. We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. GlassIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sellmer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- T.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Crook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. WashingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. FelkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.