Harper v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Defendants, Canon Harper (Harper) and Adrian Porch (Porch), bring this joint interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. We affirm.
ISSUES
Porch and Harper present two issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether the trial court erred when it denied their motion to suppress evidence; and(2) Whether the trial court erred when it failed to apply the Seatbelt Enforcement Act to the present case.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 10, 2008, Clark County…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Reiner v. DandurandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
- Johnathon R. Aslinger v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Woodson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gunn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brooks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.