Legal Opinion

ROHNER ET UX v. Neville

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1961PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiffs Rohner appeal from a decree denying their suit to quiet title to 51.9 acres of land. After trial, the court dismissed the suit because the complaint did not allege that the defendant was claiming an interest adverse to the plaintiffs. Such an allegation is required by ORS 105.605. Fildew v. Milner, 57 Or 16, 20, 109 P 1092. It does not follow, however, that the suit was properly dismissed.

There was no demurrer. In the absence of a timely demurrer, a pleading is to be construed liberally in favor of the pleader. Hill v. G & W Development Corp., 228 Or 93, 363 P2d 763. Thus…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hogue v. BourgoisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Springer v. DURRETTE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Percival v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Evans v. HogueOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. McGill v. Huling Buick CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API