Legal Opinion

Percival v. Chase

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1903PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

These are two actions of trespass quare clausum fregit, in which the plaintiff in one action sues the plaintiff in the other. The case was sent to an auditor; he made two reports which were put in evidence; Mrs. Percival had a verdict in each action; and the cases are here on exceptions taken by Chase.

Chase and Mrs. Percival owned adjoining lots on Second Street in New Bedford. Chase bought his lot in 1887, and Mrs. Percival bought hers in 1894. Mrs. Percival’s lot is south of Chase’s lot. There was an old house on Chase’s lot when he bought it in 1887; this he tore down, and in its place put…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Howe v. BassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Wishart v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Pernam v. WeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Pickman v. Trinity ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Eastman Marble Co. v. Vermont Marble Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Bon v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Kirby Lumber Co. v. Gibbs Bros. & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Temple v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API