Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Hugo Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1921No. 9916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause is here on a transcript of the record. It was a suit on a bank deposit slip. Plaintiff in error, Mrs. J.S. Hastings, had a deposit slip showing that $10,000 had been deposited for her in the Hugo National Bank by her husband, J.S. Hastings, in October, 1907. In November, 1916, she brought this suit against the bank for $10,000. In the meantime the money had all been checked out.

The facts as they appear in the pleadings are: On October 19, 1907, J.S. Hastings, husband of plaintiff in error, had approximately $10,000 on deposit in the Hugo National Bank. On said date he and his wife…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. American Nat. Bank of Stigler v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Dunn v. ClaunchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Lead & Zinc Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. McIntosh v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Henryetta Spelter Co. v. GuernseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Taliaferro v. ReirdonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API