Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Reirdon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1940No. 29023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

G. W. Taliaferro and B. N. Taliaferro, administrators of the estate of Byrd M. Taliaferro, deceased, appealed to the district court of Marshall county from an order of the county court of that county settling their final account, discharging them as administrators and distributing the estate to the heirs. From the judgment of the district court affirming the action of the county court, they prosecute this appeal. They assert that the judgment of the trial court was erroneous in three particulars, and we will dispose of their contentions in the order in which they are made.

1. The first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doggett v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Hastings v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Dills v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. AddisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Canada v. CanadaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Joe Walsh Advertising, Inc. v. Phillips Tire & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Cosar v. BemoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Barry v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API