Legal Opinion

Fort Worth Lead & Zinc Co. v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1923No. 10889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by J. E. Pottorff and W. M. Smith, as plaintiffs below, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant below, to recover judgment upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiffs’ and for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage securing the payment' of said note.

It was alleged in-the petition, in substance, that the plaintiffs had a special ownership in a certain mill and concentrating plant consisting of mill -building, engines, .boilers, giggs, pumps, belting, and all equipment, appliances, etc., located on certain land' in Ottawa county, by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wyman v. HerardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Cooper v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ward v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Meyer v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Eads v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hedlund v. BroganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API