Legal Opinion
Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 9, 1939No. A-9458PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The defendant was by information charged in the county court of Alfalfa county with the crime of unlawfully, willfully, and wrongfully, and with intent to cheat and defraud Oscar Montgomery by means of a false instrument, to wit: a check for $4.25, made payable to the Oscar Montgomery Motor Company, and drawn on the Central National Bank of Alva, Okla.; was tried on said charge, found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $10. From the judgment and sentence, the defendant appeals.
There is very little conflict in the testimony. The defendant admits that he had some work done at the Montgomery…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
- Brockman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hastings v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- McMahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Lindley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.