Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 12292PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; A. C. Brewster, Judge. Action by Bunnie McIntosh, administrator, ’ against E. E. Lynch and . another. Judgment for defendants, • and plaintiff Strings error.

1Opinion of the Court

-Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

Some, time prior to 1912, one Hillie Bear, a full-blood Creek Indian, died testate in Tulsa county, leaving an estate of land, being E. % of S. W. Vi of section 28, and N. % of S. E. % of section 10, T. 18. N., R. 12 E., in Tulsa and Creek counties, Okla. . The will left by the deceased gave one Addie Nero an interest in her estate. The will was contested, and while the contest. was pending said Addie Nero died and her husband was arrested and put in jail in Tulsa, charged with taking her life. It was claimed that Addie Nero was a niece of- Hillie Bear, deceased.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Ball v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Hastings v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hickey v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Secrest v. SecrestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API