Legal Opinion

State v. . Mull

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1944PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The only serious exception appearing on the record is the one addressed to the following excerpt from the charge:

“I instruct you that money is personal property; and I further instruct you that under the law as it applies, gas tickets or coupons are recognized as personal property, and that the taking of them is a breach of the statute as charged against the defendants.”

The alleged vice of this instruction is, that it enlarges upon or departs from the bill of indictment, which specifies the property taken as “two dollars in money” and makes no reference to any gas tickets or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. State v. . KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. People v. NolanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API