Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 9, 1972No. 56PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

“It is a fundamental and sacred principle of the common law, deeply imbedded in our criminal jurisprudence, that no person can be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb for the same offense. S. v. Prince, 63 N.C. 529, S. v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 511, 64 S.E. 2d 871. It was incorporated in the Bill of Rights of the Federal Constitution. (United States Constitution, Amendment V.) While the principle is not stated in express terms in the North Carolina Constitution, it has been regarded as an integral part of the ‘law of the land’ within the meaning of Art. I, sec. 17. S. v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. LeviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API