Legal Opinion

State v. . Keller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1938PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Defendants’ exceptive assignment is well taken to the refusal of the court below to give in form or in substance this request for instruction: “Before the defendants, or either of them, be found guilty of larceny by the threat of using firearms or other weapons, it would be necessary for it to be found that not only was there a threat of the use of a pistol or weapon of some sort but that actually such pistol or other weapon was at the time in the possession of the defendants or one of them at the time of the threat being made, or at the time the alleged assault and larceny was being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Champion Shoe MacHinery Co. v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Johnston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API