Legal Opinion

McKelvey v. Boeing North American, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1999No. B125285, B125298, B130137, B130146PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*155Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J .

The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the plaintiffs have pled facts sufficient to establish delayed discovery of their claims or whether, instead, their complaints were filed too late. We conclude the actions are time barred.

A. The 1997 Actions

1. McKelvey

In October 1997, Barbara A. McKelvey and John Walakavage (collectively McKelvey) filed a class action against Boeing North American, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation, Rocketdyne, Inc., Atomics International, Inc., Hughes Aircraft Company and others.1 In her first amended complaint filed in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API