Legal Opinion
State v. Alkire
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 15, 2004No. 52500-0-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
100 P.3d 837 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jeffrey ALKIRE, Appellant.
No. 52500-0-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 15, 2004.
David Bruce Koch, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Thomas Marshal Curtis, Snohomish County Pros. Office, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
ELLINGTON, A.C.J.
Any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the maximum authorized by the verdict aloneother than the fact of a prior convictionmust be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.[1] The sentencing court in this case imposed an increased penalty based on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BatistaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. BrundageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- People v. OrthColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.