State v. Clarke
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Cox, C.J.
— Except for prior convictions, “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”1 The “statutory maximum” for this purpose is the maximum sentence a judge may impose “solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant.”2 But judges may make factual findings that increase a defendant’s minimum sentence so long as that sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum for the crime.3
¶2 Here, we must decide whether the indeterminate…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.