Legal Opinion

State v. Clarke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 2004No. 53003-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Cox, C.J.

— Except for prior convictions, “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”1 The “statutory maximum” for this purpose is the maximum sentence a judge may impose “solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant.”2 But judges may make factual findings that increase a defendant’s minimum sentence so long as that sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum for the crime.3

¶2 Here, we must decide whether the indeterminate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API