State v. Brundage
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 A jury convicted James Brundage of multiple crimes stemming from an attack on his wife, D.E.B. He appeals, arguing numerous trial court errors. In supplemental briefing, he also claims that his exceptional sentences violate the Sixth Amendment under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004). We affirm.
Houghton, J.
Facts
¶2 Brundage and D.E.B. met and began dating in 1992. They married in August 1999. During their relationship, they had two children.
¶3 Due to marital difficulties, D.E.B. left the couple’s home in September 2002. D.E.B. left some…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Norris v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.