Legal Opinion
State v. Clarke
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 27, 2004No. 53003-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 P.3d 262 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
John Mark CLARKE, Appellant.
No. 53003-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 27, 2004.
Thomas Michael Kummerow, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Erin Hairopoulos Becker, Brian Martin McDonald, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
PUBLISHED IN PART
COX, C.J.
Except for prior convictions, "any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt."[1] The "statutory maximum" for this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BorboaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. HalseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.