Legal Opinion

Ranney v. Donovan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Branch. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit upon the following contract:

“ Chicago, Aug. 1, 1885.
“ This agreement, entered in and agreed to by James Donovan, of the first part, and John S. Ranney, of the second part.
“ That the said Donovan, in case of the sale of certain tracts of pine land in town 37 and 38, range 17 and 18, state of Wisconsin, is to pay the said John S. Ranney one-half of any price that may be obtained above one dollar and sixty-five cents per thousand ($1.65); the guaranty cut being 23,000,000 on the green tract and 25,000,000 on the red; the net price of the red tract to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Raisin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Walker v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Montross v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Friar v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wasser v. Western Land Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Jameson v. ColdwellOregon Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API