Montross v. Eddy
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDurand, J.
The plaintiff is a commission dealer in lands, and he brings this suit for services which he claims to have performed for the defendants, in assisting them about the sale, for $90,000, of some pine timber lands, to-Pitts & Cranage, of Bay Citjr, Mich.
*101The plaintiff claims that in 1885 lie bad these same lands for sale at $50,000, and tbat, being in Bay City in September, 1887, a Mr. Burton, wbo knew of this fact, and wbo represented Pitts & Cranage, asked bim if tbe lands in question bad been sold, to wbicb be responded tbat be did not know, upon wbicb Mr. Burton asked bim to find out, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ranney v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by18 opinions
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- McDermott v. Fairmont Gas & Light Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.