Legal Opinion

Corns v. Nickelston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cubiam.

In the case on appeal, the letter “(A)” appears at the beginning and also at the end of the court’s charge. No exception appears between “(A)” and “(A)”; but after the last “(A)” there appears, without explanation of any kind, these words and figures: “Exception No. 1, Exception No. 2, Exception No. 8, Exception No. 4.” These “exceptions” do not in any manner indicate in what respect defendant considered the charge erroneous. In Assignments of Error Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, which he attempts to base on said “exceptions,” defendant asserts the court erred in failing to instruct the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. King v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Rigsbee v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Moore v. CrosswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Performance Motors, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Redman v. NanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API