Legal Opinion

Performance Motors, Inc. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1974No. 734SC717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the failure of the trial court to allow its motion, filed 9 October 1972, to strike defendant’s amended answer which was filed on 14 September 1972. In its motion to strike, plaintiff contends the amended answer is “redundant, irrelevant and immaterial,” that it invades the province of the jury, and was filed without authority of the court after time for answering had expired.

Defendant contends the amended answer was authorized by the Supreme Court opinion (page 398) in the following words: “The parties may be permitted to amend their pleadings, if they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrosswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Collyer v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Corns v. NickelstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Keiltex Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Houston v. RivensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API