Moore v. Crosswell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJoiiNsoN, J.
This appeal is predicated upon assignments of error, both of omission and commission, in the charge. Yet, the assignments urged are not supported by exceptions previously noted as required by our rules. See Rules 19 (3) and 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 554. While exceptions to the charge may be noted after trial, when the statement of case on appeal is prepared, even so, such exceptions should be included in appellant’s statement of case on appeal as served on the appellee, in order that the latter may be fully apprised at that juncture of the theory of the appeal. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Worley v. Laurel River Logging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Donnell v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Rigsbee v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.