Legal Opinion

Redman v. Nance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1978No. 7723SC468Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury.

The failure of plaintiff to except to the statement of the trial judge, when made, that out of “an abundance of precaution” he was submitting the contributory negligence issue to the jury, did not constitute a waiver. Carruthers v. R.R., 215 N.C. 675, 2 S.E. 2d 878 (1939). Exceptions to the charge may be noted after trial and included in the appellant’s record on appeal. Corns v. Nickelston, 257 N.C. 277, 125 S.E. 2d 588 (1962); Bank v. Barry,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corruthers v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Bank of North Carolina, N. A. v. BarryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Corns v. NickelstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Payne v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API