Telford v. Mart Produce, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s order dismissing plaintiff-appellant Mike Tel-ford’s claim against the defendant-respondent Mart Produce. The district court dismissed the case because Telford failed to serve Mart Produce within the six-month period prescribed by Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure 4(a)(2). We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Pursuant to I.R.C.P. 4(a)(2), the district court dismissed this case for failure to effect timely service. Because the action was dismissed on procedural grounds, it is unnecessary to recite the facts framing the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Farmers National Bank v. ShireyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martin v. HoblitIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Rudd v. MerrittIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Nerco Minerals Co. v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Boise Mode, LLC v. Donahoe Pace & Partners Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.