Legal Opinion

Telford v. Mart Produce, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1998No. 23069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s order dismissing plaintiff-appellant Mike Tel-ford’s claim against the defendant-respondent Mart Produce. The district court dismissed the case because Telford failed to serve Mart Produce within the six-month period prescribed by Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure 4(a)(2). We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Pursuant to I.R.C.P. 4(a)(2), the district court dismissed this case for failure to effect timely service. Because the action was dismissed on procedural grounds, it is unnecessary to recite the facts framing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Farmers National Bank v. ShireyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Martin v. HoblitIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rudd v. MerrittIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nerco Minerals Co. v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Boise Mode, LLC v. Donahoe Pace & Partners Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API