Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hoblit

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1999No. 24798PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

Gerald and Carol Martin appeal from the dismissal of their complaint against the defendant for failure to complete timely service of process as required by Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 4(a)(2). We affirm the dismissal order.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts are concisely stated in the district court’s Opinion and Order Re: Motion to Dismiss:

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on May 4, 1995, alleging that the negligence of defendant in the operation of his vehicle on May 5, 1993, resulted in personal injuries to plaintiff husband. A summons was issued by the Office of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Wood Products, Inc. v. Lawrence A. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. HobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Leonard v. Stuart-James Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wilson v. RibbensSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Lohman v. FlynnIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Regjovich v. First Western Investments, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API