Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Merritt

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2003No. 27748PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from judgments dismissing this action as to all of the Defendants because of the failure of the Plaintiffs to serve the summons and complaint upon the Defendants within the six-month period required by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court held that the Plaintiffs had failed to show good cause for failing to serve the summons and complaint timely, and we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The relevant facts in this case come from various affidavits, some of which are conflicting. On February 7, 2000, the Plaintiffs filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nerco Minerals Co. v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Regjovich v. First Western Investments, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Telford v. Mart Produce, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Beus v. BeusIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Tapadeera, LLC v. KnowltonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Campbell v. ReaganIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API