Legal Opinion

Baumgardner v. Stuckey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:

¶ 1 Richard L. and Marcia H. Baum-gardner (the Baumgardners) appeal from a final decree entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County denying their motion for post-trial relief. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2 On June 17,1988, Gordon D. Stuck-ey, a truck driver, purchased a home in the Sheffield Manor property development located in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania. From 1989 to present, Stuckey has intermittently parked his truck-tractor on his property within Sheffield Manor, and since 1991, he has also parked one or more trailers at that residential site.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. Park Lane for Convalescents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Baederwood, Inc. v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Heidt v. Aughenbaugh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Siciliano v. MislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pocono Summit Realty, LLC v. Ahmad Amer, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, & Cultural Society of North America v. Township of West PikelandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Smart v. CarpenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Buck Hill Falls Co. v. Clifford PressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Dawson v. Holiday Pocono Civic Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API