Williams, D. v. Taylor, H.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:
Henry L. Taylor and his three logging companies 1 appeal from the judgment following a non-jury trial, in which Duane Williams sought to prohibit the Taylor Companies from driving over a private lane on his property. The trial judge found that the Taylor Companies may not, as a matter of law, obtain a prescriptive easement under Pennsylvania's Unenclosed Woodlands Act of 1850. 2 We affirm.
*449 Approximately 8.1 billion trees comprise Pennsylvania 3 -a/k/a "Penn's woods." Here, we must consider the legal status of the trees growing on Mr. Williams' farm, where a private…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stephan v. Waldron Electric Heating & Cooling LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Voracek v. Crown Castle USA Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- PA Energy Vision, LLC v. South Avis Realty, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Kurtz v. HokeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gruca, R. v. Clearbrook CommunitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Kuhstoss, B. v. Steele, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Steinbeiser, C. v. Wertz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Alder Run v. Lutz, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. DiSabatino, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.