Legal Opinion

Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0272PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 The Salvation Army and Edward Stuart appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of punitive damages, its denial of their motion for a new trial on all issues, its grant of a partial new trial only as to the amount of punitive damages, and its entry of judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand with directions.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Exiquio Sinaloa was struck and killed at 9:25 p.m. on March 26, 1996, while…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. FIRETRACE USA, LLC v. JesclardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  5. Brooks v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API