Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Gray
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 9, 2003No. A03A0266, A03A0267PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
In separate lawsuits, Charles Flowers and Corey Brooks sued Peter Gray for injuries they received from an automobile collision in which Gray’s vehicle struck their vehicle. The plaintiffs also sought punitive damages on the ground that Gray’s driving his vehicle between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. (which former OCGA § 40-5-24 (b) (1) (A) prohibited because of Gray’s Class D license) amounted to wilful and wanton conduct and a conscious indifference to consequences. In both cases, the court granted partial summary judgment to Gray. Flowers and Brooks appeal. We discern…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Moore v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Tower Financial Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lindsey v. Clinch County Glass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Mastec North America, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Dagne v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Boeing Co. v. Blane International Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Duncan v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.