Legal Opinion
Nutmeg Insurance v. Atwell, Vogel & Sterling
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided January 20, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 85-3154PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILDRED E. METHVIN, United States Magistrate.
Defendant Equifax Services, Inc. (Equifax) seeks to compel the deposition testimo*506ny and the production of documents by Richard S. Harrington, the designated representative of Nutmeg Insurance Company (Nutmeg) and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford). Equifax also seeks the reasonable fees and expenses incurred in bringing the motion, as well as the round trip travel and lodging expenses incurred in traveling to Hartford, Connecticut for the deposition of Harrington pursuant to F.R. C.P. Rule 37 and Rule 11. Defendant Louisiana Companies…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re International Systems And Controls Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Dave BumpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- American Hangar, Inc. v. Basic Line, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Diamond State Insurance v. Rebel Oil Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
- Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.